California Law and Ethics Practice Exam

What does "judicious self-disclosure" entail for practitioners?

1. Sharing personal experiences to build rapport

2. Revealing information only when it's beneficial to the client

3. Providing personal details only for entertainment

4. Disclosing information to assert authority over clients

The correct answer is: Revealing information only when it's beneficial to the client

Judicious self-disclosure refers to the careful and thoughtful sharing of personal information by practitioners in a professional context, specifically when it serves a clear purpose that benefits the client. This practice is grounded in the ethical principles of fostering a supportive and trusting relationship while maintaining professional boundaries. In this context, revealing information only when it’s beneficial to the client underscores the importance of intention behind self-disclosure. The practitioner evaluates whether sharing specific personal experiences or insights will aid in the client's understanding, promote their well-being, or enhance the therapeutic alliance. This approach ensures that disclosures are not self-serving but instead strategically used to support the therapeutic process. The other options suggest forms of self-disclosure that do not align with ethical practices. Sharing personal experiences solely to build rapport without considering the impact on the client might lead to blurred boundaries. Providing personal details purely for entertainment is inappropriate and unprofessional, as it detracts from the focus on the client's needs. Disclosing information to assert authority undermines the client’s autonomy and can damage the trust necessary for effective practice. Thus, the most ethical and beneficial approach is to share personal insights only if they serve a clear and constructive purpose for the client’s benefit.