California Law and Ethics Practice Exam

What is the difference between boundary violations and boundary crossings in social work practice?

1. Boundary violations involve acceptable relationships.

2. Boundary crossings include potential exploitative behaviors.

3. Boundary violations exploit clients or engage unacceptably.

4. Boundary crossings are always unacceptable relationships.

The correct answer is: Boundary violations exploit clients or engage unacceptably.

Boundary violations are characterized by actions that exploit, harm, or otherwise engage in unacceptable behaviors towards clients. These violations occur when the professional's actions cross ethical limits to an extent that can cause damage to the therapeutic relationship or exploit the client's vulnerability. Examples might include taking advantage of a client financially, engaging in sexual relationships, or any form of harassment. In contrast, boundary crossings can occur when a social worker steps outside traditional professional boundaries but generally do so with the intent to benefit the client. These crossings are minor and often involve interactions that could contribute positively to the therapeutic relationship if handled judiciously. They are typically seen as professional decisions that require careful consideration rather than outright violations. The correct answer highlights that boundary violations are specifically harmful and exploitative behaviors, distinguishing them from more ambiguous boundary crossings that may not cause the same degree of risk to the client. Understanding this distinction is crucial for social workers to maintain ethical standards and foster a safe environment for their clients.